Have a question?
Message sent Close

Protein-Protein Modeling — Free Certification Assessment

Protein-Protein Modeling — Free Certification Assessment

Test your knowledge of protein-protein docking — interfaces, HADDOCK, hot spots, and CAPRI metrics. Pass at 70% to earn a verifiable StemSkills certificate you can download as a PDF and add to your LinkedIn profile. Free.

time left:
:
:

Protein-Protein Modeling — Certification Assessment

Submit quiz
Once you submit, you will no longer be able to change your answers. Are you sure you want to submit the quiz?

Free certification assessment. Pass at 70% to earn a verifiable StemSkills certificate.

1.
Protein–protein docking predicts:
The DNA sequence of a gene
How two proteins assemble into a complex (relative orientation/interface)
The codon usage
The melting temperature
2.
A protein–protein "interface" refers to:
The solvent box
The force field file
The set of residues in contact between the two partners
The GUI of the software
3.
HADDOCK is notable for being a:
Force field
Sequence aligner
Data-driven docking approach that uses experimental/ predicted restraints
Rendering engine
4.
"Shape complementarity" at an interface describes:
Equal molecular weights
The same secondary structure
Geometric fit between the two protein surfaces
Identical sequences
5.
Rigid-body protein–protein docking initially treats each protein as:
A single atom
A flexible chain sampled residue-by-residue
A rigid object, sampling relative translations/rotations
A DNA duplex
6.
"Induced fit" at a protein–protein interface means:
Conformational changes occur upon binding
The interface never changes
Only water binds
The sequence mutates
7.
Buried surface area (BSA) upon complex formation is used to:
Count chains
Assign charges
Measure temperature
Characterize interface size/extent of burial
8.
A common scoring signal for a plausible PPI model is:
Maximum steric clash
Favorable shape + electrostatic/hydrophobic complementarity with few clashes
Random orientation
Zero contacts
9.
Which experimental data most directly informs restraint-based PPI docking?
Mutagenesis/cross-linking/NMR data on interface residues
Codon bias
Ligand solubility
Gene expression microarray
10.
"Hot spot" residues at an interface are:
Buried metal ions
Only glycines
Residues far from the interface
A few residues contributing disproportionately to binding energy
11.
Homodimer vs heterodimer differ in that a homodimer has:
Only DNA
Two identical protein chains
Two different proteins
No interface
12.
A major challenge in protein–protein docking (vs small-molecule docking) is:
There is never any interface
No scoring is possible
Large, flat interfaces and backbone flexibility of both partners
Ligands are too small
13.
FFT-based docking (e.g., ZDOCK-style) accelerates the search by:
Ignoring the receptor
Efficiently scanning translations/rotations via correlation in Fourier space
Aligning sequences
Running MD only
14.
Refinement of a docked complex often uses:
Gel filtration
PCR
Sequence trimming
Energy minimization / short MD and interface side-chain repacking
15.
Co-evolution / coupled mutations between two proteins can indicate:
No relationship
Residue pairs likely in contact at the interface
The melting point
The expression host
16.
An "encounter complex" in PPI refers to:
The final crystal structure
Transient early-association states before the final bound complex
A denatured protein
A ligand pose
17.
Which metric assesses a predicted complex against a reference (CAPRI-style)?
BLAST e-value
Codon adaptation index
Interface RMSD / ligand RMSD / fraction of native contacts (fnat)
Tm
18.
Electrostatic steering in association means:
Water is removed
Charges are ignored
Only van der Waals matters
Long-range electrostatics can guide partners toward the correct orientation
19.
AlphaFold-Multimer / deep-learning complex prediction primarily leverages:
Gel electrophoresis
Manual docking only
Explicit-solvent MD only
Evolutionary/co-evolution signals + learned structural patterns
20.
After predicting a complex, a reasonable validation is to check:
The PCR cycle number
The gene promoter
The ligand's molecular weight only
Interface plausibility, clash score, and stability under short MD
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20